Students' Science Literacy Profile in Terms of Argumentation Competence on Ecosystem Material
Main Article Content
Abstract
Current curricula integrate technological skills, knowledge, abilities, and competencies, as well as skills and attitudes, with reading and writing teaching. As a result, information and communication technology is crucial to the implementation of a typical curriculum. Students in Indonesia generally have a low level of science literacy. Therefore, this study aims to test the availability of science literacy skills of high school students. The sample selected for this study was a student of 7 grader consisting of 34 people. The methodology used in this study is descriptive-quantitative research, where this study uses descriptives, such as size, quantity, or frequency in its range. The instrument used in this study is a double-selection test, consisting of six subjects according to the competence indicator of science literacy ability. In this study it was found that the achievement of scientific literacy competence aspects of competence on indicators explain the phenomena scientifically categorized very well, then the ability on the indicator to evaluate and design scientific research categorized well. So, it can be concluded that the average literacy of science on the overall aspect of competence is in good category.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abbas, S., & Sawamura, H. (2009). Developing an argument learning environment using agent-based ITS (ALES). EDM’09 - Educational Data Mining 2009: 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 200–209.
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education,
Anjani, L. L. (2024). Pengaruh keterampilan argumentasi terhadap kemampuan literasi fisika peserta didik dengan diterapkannya model pembelajaran Argument-Divine Inquiry (ADI). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA. 1(1), 9-13.
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116.
Herawati, D., Istiana, R., & Ardianto, D. (2019). Membangun keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa melaluimodel pembelajaran argumentation real-world inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 3(2), 70–76.
Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636.
Kamariah, Muhlis, & Ramdani, A. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran project-based learning (pjbl) terhadap literasi sains peserta didik. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(1), 209.
Kim, S. Y., & Hamdan Alghamdi, A. K. (2020). Saudi Arabian secondary students’ views of the nature of science within Islamic context. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2266–2283.
Marpaung, R. R. T., Yolida, B., & Putri, F. R. (2021). Student’s scientific literacy on environmental pollution material based on SETS learning approach combined with Vee Diagram. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 117–125.
Marwah, A. S., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2024). Literasi sains siswa dalam berinovasi pada pembelajaran IPA berbasis produk. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 114–126.
Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil literasi sains dan model pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223–228.
Muhammad, S. N., Listiani, & Adhani, A. (2018). Kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada materi ekosistem di SMA Negeri 3 Tarakan Kalimantan Utara. QUANTUM: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 2550–0716.
Nofiana, M. (2017). Profil Kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP di kota Purwokerto ditinjau dari aspek konten, proses, dan konteks sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77.
Noor, M. S. A. M. (2021). Assessing secondary students’ scientific literacy: A comparative study of suburban schools in England and Malaysia. Science Education International, 32(4), 343–352.
Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum merdeka untuk pemulihan krisis pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251–262.
Nurramadhani, A., Ms, H., & Rahman, T. (2017). Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI): the way to develop junior high school student's argumentation skills in science learning. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education,128-132. Atlantis Press.
Nurtamara, L., Sajidan, S., & Suranto, S. (2019). The importance socio-scientific issues of in biology learning preparing students as a 21st century society. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 0–8.
Pursitasari, I.D., & Nurramadhani, A. (2021). Science context-based inquiry learning model: Feasibility study to develop students’ critical thinking skills and science literacy. International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education. 4(1), 25-26.
Setiawan, A., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Analysis of the implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) in students’ argumentation skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 127–133.
Setyaningsih, A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Parmin, P. (2019). Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented-guided inquiry learning berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik dalam pembelajaran asam basa terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 168–179.
Wulandari, N., & Wulandari, N. (2016). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains pada aspek pengetahuan dan kompetensi sains siswa SMP pada materi kalor. Edusains, 8(1), 66–
Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik indonesia: hasil pisa dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19.