Does the Creative Problem-Solving Model Improve Students' Argumentation Skills?

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Oct 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v8i2.12
Keywords:
Creative Problem Solving, Biodiversity, Argumentation Skills

Main Article Content

Ainu Zakiah Maulidiyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Tri Wahyu Agustina
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Tuti Kurniati
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Abstract

Argumentation skills are one of the skills of the 21st century. The research aims to analyze students' achievement of argumentation skills using the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) model on biodiversity material. Qualitative research with descriptive methods. The research subjects were class X students in one of the Bandung City schools. The purposive sampling technique used 30 students. The argumentation skills question instrument is based on Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern which has level 1-5 criteria containing 12 essay questions. The research results showed that the students' strongest argumentation skills were at level 3 at 63.3 Percent with sufficient criteria and the weakest at level 1 and level 5 with very weak criteria. The criteria for level 1 are very weak, level 2 is weak, level 3 is sufficient, level 4 is strong, and level 5 is very strong. It is important for other education experts to acquire argumentation skills in the learning process.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maulidiyah, A. Z., Agustina, T. W. ., & Kurniati, T. (2024). Does the Creative Problem-Solving Model Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills?. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 8(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v8i2.12
Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Arianti, P. E., Yuliana, I. F., & Fatayah, F. (2024). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah pada materi reaksi redoks di ma al-balagh bulutigo. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 13(1), 46–51.

Devi, N. D. C., VH, E. S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2019). Analysis of high school students’ argumentation ability in the topic of buffer solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141-151.

Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer Science & Business Media.

Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, H., & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa melalui action research dengan fokus tindakan think pair share. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning. 15(1), 253-259.

Festiyed, F. (2009). Pengembangan Generic Life Skill Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama pada Pembelajaran Fisika.

Fitriyanti, F. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Menulis Argumentasi Siswa SMP Melalui TAP (Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern) Pada Konsep Pemanasan Global [Thesis]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi.

Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, M. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32-37.

Hasnunidah, N., & Susilo, H. (2014). Profil perspektif sosiokultural mahasiswa dalam berargumentasi pada mata kuliah biologi dasar.

Huda, M. (2013). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Jewaru, A. a. L., Parno, P., & Nasikhudin, N. (2021). Identifikasi kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa sma pada termodinamika. Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 6(9), 1436-1466.

Karlina, G., & Alberida, H. (2021). Kemampuan argumentasi pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 1–7.

Muthoifin, M., & Jinan, M. (2015). Pendidikan karakter ki hadjar dewantara: studi kritis pemikiran karakter dan budi pekerti dalam tinjauan islam. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(2), 167-180.

Nisak, F. N. F., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa dengan penggunaan media photovoice pada materi pembiasan cahaya. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 35-45.

Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019, June). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1241(1), 012034. IOP Publishing.

Nurramadhani, A., Ms, H., & Rahman, T. (2017). Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI): The way to develop junior high school student's argumentation skills in science learning. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 128-132.

Partayasa, W., Suharta, I. G. P., & Suparta, I. N. (2020). Pengaruh model Creative Problem Solving (CPS) berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari minat. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 168-179.

Shoimin, A. (2017). 68 model pembelajaran inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Suraya, S., Setiadi, A. E., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2019). Argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui metode debat. Edusains, 11(2), 233-241.

Tanfiziyah, R., Khasanah, M., Riandi, R., & Supriatno, B. (2021). Inovasi pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi: model learning cycle 5e menggunakan gather town pada materi protista:(information technology-based learning innovation: 5E learning cycle model using gather town on protista material. Biodik, 7(3), 1-10.

Wahdan, W. Z., Sulistina, O., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah materi ikatan kimia peserta didik sma, man, dan perguruan tinggi tingkat I. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 2(2), 30–40.

Yuliati, Y., & Lestari, I. (2019). Penerapan model Creative Problem Solving untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(1), 32-39.