Comparative Effectiveness of STEAM and Scientific Approaches on Elementary Students’ Learning Outcomes in Social Studies: The Case of Indonesian Cultural Diversity

Authors

  • Suci Lathifah Universitas Pakuan
  • Siti Nurhalisa Universitas Pakuan
  • Bintang Ramadhani Universitas Pakuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v10i1.64

Keywords:

STEAM approach, scientific approach, learning outcomes, Social Studies, Cultural diversity

Abstract

Social Studies (IPS) instruction in elementary schools still faces challenges in fostering deep student understanding, particularly on contextual topics such as Indonesia’s cultural diversity. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) approach and the scientific approach in improving students’ learning outcomes. A quasi-experimental method with a pretest–posttest control group design was employed. The participants were 50 fourth-grade students at SD Negeri Ciheuleut 2, Bogor City, divided into two groups of 25 students, with each group receiving a different instructional approach. Data were collected using a validated learning outcomes test (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.781) and analyzed through an independent sample t-test. The results showed that the STEAM approach produced higher learning gains than the scientific approach. The STEAM group achieved an average N-gain score of 0.65 (upper range of the moderate category), while the scientific group obtained 0.42 (moderate). The mean post-test score of the STEAM group (83.6) was also higher than that of the scientific group (76.4), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.003). These findings indicate that the STEAM approach is more effective in enhancing students’ understanding of cultural diversity. Therefore, it is recommended for elementary Social Studies instruction due to its ability to integrate multiple disciplines in a meaningful and contextualized learning process.

References

Altenberga, J., & Rubene, Z. (2022). How to learn science literacy? Overview of most topical and researched learning approaches. In Human, technologies and quality of education, 2022 (pp. 487–498). University of Latvia Press. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022.35

Anggraini, F. D. P., Aprianti, Setyawati, V. A. V., & Hartanto, A. A. (2022). Pembelajaran statistika menggunakan software SPSS untuk uji validitas dan reliabilitas. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6491–6504. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3206

Asrizal, A., Dhanil, M., & Usmeldi, U. (2023). The effect of STEAM on science learning on student learning achievement: A meta-analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1650–1657. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3108

Atikah, C., & Biru, L. T. (2024). STEAM-based learning to enhance early childhood creativity. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 4(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v4i1.303

Călin, M. (2022). The role of STEAM projects in the interactive and captivating involvement of students in the learning process. In Materialele conferinței științifice naționale cu participare internațională «Probleme ale științelor socioumanistice și ale modernizării învățământului» (pp. 62–67). “Ion Creangă” State Pedagogical University. https://doi.org/10.46728/c.v2.25-03-2022.p62-67

Fadhilah, M. N., Fawaid, A., Yuliati, I., & Rahmah, N. (2025). Development of a Madurese local wisdom-based learning model using a STEAM integrative approach to improve creativity and innovation of Indonesian elementary school students. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 17(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v17i2.44294

Gracia, E., Nurohman, S., & Wilujeng, I. (2024). Analysis the implementation of STEAM approach on creative thinking ability in science learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 757–763. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7782

Gupta, K. (2023). Validity and reliability of students’ assessment: Case for recognition as a unified concept of valid reliability. International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research, 13(3), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_382_23

Iffiani, Z., Chaerunnisa, Surudin, Y., Rosdianto, Ngabidin, & Kartika, I. (2024). Pengembangan kurikulum berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan kemampuan berfikir kritis. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i4.1217

Juliharti, L., Hidayati, A., Helsa, Y., & Asrizal, A. (2024). Investigating the impact of STEAM learning on higher order thinking and science achievement. Ta’dib, 27(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v27i1.12270

Mansyur, M. I., Sumarno, S., & Dwijayanti, I. (2024). Analisis model pembelajaran STEAM dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Pedagogika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 4(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.57251/ped.v4i1.1394

Muhammad, R. R., Lawson, D., Aslam, F., & Crawford, M. (2022). The scientific approach of the Indonesian 2013 curriculum: A comparison with other active learning strategies in mathematics. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.523

Muhammad, R. R., Lawson, D., Aslam, F., & Crawford, M. (2023). Indonesian curriculum 2013 ten years on: Impact on mathematics teaching. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(SI), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.616SI

Muntazah, A., Elizar, Apriza, B., & Suprapto, I. (2025). The effectiveness of STEAM learning model implementation in primary school students’ IPAS learning: A systematic literature review. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v8i1.89722

Nasrah, N., Amir, R. H., & Purwanti, R. Y. (2021). Efektivitas model pembelajaran STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) pada siswa kelas IV SD. JKPD (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar), 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26618/jkpd.v6i1.4166

Nguyen, A. Q. (2025). Pedagogical approaches in STEAM education. In Transformative approaches to STEAM integration in modern education (pp. 53–78). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7408-5.ch003

Ofori Bekoe, S. (2023). Construction and analysis of items for assessing learning outcomes: Concise models for ensuring validity. International Research in Education, 11(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v11i2.21160

Okwara, V. U., & Pretorius, J. P. H. (2023). The STEAM vs STEM educational approach: The significance of the application of the arts in science teaching for learners’ attitudes change. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 6(2), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2023.6

Pahmi, S., Juandi, D., & Sugiarni, R. (2022). The effect of STEAM in mathematics learning on 21st century skills: A systematic literature reviews. PRISMA, 11(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i1.2039

Salamah, I., & Susapti, P. (2025). STEAM berbasis budaya lokal dalam pembelajaran ilmu sosial: Inovasi kreatif untuk siswa MI. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar, 13(2), 49–66. https://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/alibtida/article/view/6469

Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2024). K-12 STEAM education in Latin America: A systematic review. In 2024 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE60625.2024.10500534

Siswati. (2023). Penerapan pembelajaran saintifik sebagai alternatif meningkatkan hasil belajar dan ketrampilan siswa. Discovery: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 8(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.33752/discovery.v8i1.3922

Suandari, A., & Afrijal. (2026). The effectiveness of STEAM-based learning on elementary school students’ cultural and civic literacy skills. JIPSINDO, 13(2), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipsindo.v13i2.100976

Temiz, Z., & Çevik, M. (2024). STEAM education with young learners: Five different design processes. Early Years, 44(3–4), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2023.2274293

Wanojaleni, K. (2021). Konsep dan implementasi pembelajaran scientific Kurikulum 2013. QALAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.57210/qlm.v2i2.89

Zakaria, S., & Md Osman, S. Z. (2024). STEAM innovation: Curriculum alignment, experimental learning, and transdisciplinary approaches. International Journal of Modern Education, 6(22), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.622024

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Lathifah, S., Nurhalisa, S., & Ramadhani, B. (2026). Comparative Effectiveness of STEAM and Scientific Approaches on Elementary Students’ Learning Outcomes in Social Studies: The Case of Indonesian Cultural Diversity. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 10(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v10i1.64

Issue

Section

Articles